I enjoyed this. Thank you. There is one bone of contention: "and that CO2 has a warming influence. That is not in dispute."
It is very much in dispute that this influence is of any significance whatsoever. VERY much in dispute. Ill guess that somewhere around half of America sees it as political horseshit.
Hey Jeck, I'm with you on the notion that CO2's impact is waaaaaaaaaay overblown. I'm not preaching to the choir on this one, just trying to start a "fact checker" on the road to redemption. I'll agree with them that atmospheric CO2 has a warming influence but imho it is trivial, like the doubling of CO2 in the atmosphere from 200ppm to 400ppm compared to the impact of the sun, changes to the magnetic field, decades of overt weather mod, decades of covert weather mod, manmade dust, damming rivers, widespread groundwater irrigation, etc. Thank you for chiming in and sharing your thoughts. Hopefully more Americans will join us in our healthy skepticism of the CO2 centric story.
Here's an idea to consider: At the levels we are dealing with, increases in CO2 is actually beneficial to life on earth. It is plant food. The earth gets greener as CO2 is more available.
The Globalists' propaganda that CO2 increases will kill us all is an INVERSION designed to 1) keep our attention on the wrong thing, 2) keep us ignorant of truths, and 3) be a cornerstone of faith in their new religion of the global commons, and 4) stampede us into self-destruction while thinking we are saving the world.
Of course they profit off our misdirection at every opportunity in every way conceivable.
Hello Jeck, you are clearly quite informed on this topic. Thank you for sharing your thoughts. I am curious to hear your perspective on Dane Wiggington's overarching narrative in regards to climate change.
Though I appreciate his work to raise awareness on the broader issue and occasionally share links to his work, I have always been skeptical of Dane's repetitive assertion that covert climate geoengineers have been working "to mask the severity of a planet already in catastrophic climate meltdown". Mr Wiggington often mentions weather warfare and other nefarious reasons for messing with the weather/climate, but almost everything he publishes makes a point of saying that the climate is already past some tipping point where feedback loops are engaged and runaway warming is inevitable. I noticed this in his work a decade ago, and I notice the same in his modern work.
My skepticism largely arises from a distrust of the mainstream CO2 centric climate change doomerism, and also from my own observations of the skies overhead. I've been skywatching and following skywatchers online for over a decade, and the most common thing I've noticed in planes leaving lingering, spreading trails at 30-40k feet that form high cirrus hazes, often covering the sky from horizon to horizon with a high wispy haze. Everything I have read asserts that high cirrus hazes trap heat and have a net warming impact on temperatures at earth's surface. As such, I doubt the notion that one of the main goals of current geoengineering operations is to cool the planet because most of the signs I've seen in the sky point to intentional warming.
That's where I'm coming from and am curious what your thoughts are. Thank you.
I enjoyed this. Thank you. There is one bone of contention: "and that CO2 has a warming influence. That is not in dispute."
It is very much in dispute that this influence is of any significance whatsoever. VERY much in dispute. Ill guess that somewhere around half of America sees it as political horseshit.
Hey Jeck, I'm with you on the notion that CO2's impact is waaaaaaaaaay overblown. I'm not preaching to the choir on this one, just trying to start a "fact checker" on the road to redemption. I'll agree with them that atmospheric CO2 has a warming influence but imho it is trivial, like the doubling of CO2 in the atmosphere from 200ppm to 400ppm compared to the impact of the sun, changes to the magnetic field, decades of overt weather mod, decades of covert weather mod, manmade dust, damming rivers, widespread groundwater irrigation, etc. Thank you for chiming in and sharing your thoughts. Hopefully more Americans will join us in our healthy skepticism of the CO2 centric story.
Here's an idea to consider: At the levels we are dealing with, increases in CO2 is actually beneficial to life on earth. It is plant food. The earth gets greener as CO2 is more available.
The Globalists' propaganda that CO2 increases will kill us all is an INVERSION designed to 1) keep our attention on the wrong thing, 2) keep us ignorant of truths, and 3) be a cornerstone of faith in their new religion of the global commons, and 4) stampede us into self-destruction while thinking we are saving the world.
Of course they profit off our misdirection at every opportunity in every way conceivable.
Satanic
Hello Jeck, you are clearly quite informed on this topic. Thank you for sharing your thoughts. I am curious to hear your perspective on Dane Wiggington's overarching narrative in regards to climate change.
Though I appreciate his work to raise awareness on the broader issue and occasionally share links to his work, I have always been skeptical of Dane's repetitive assertion that covert climate geoengineers have been working "to mask the severity of a planet already in catastrophic climate meltdown". Mr Wiggington often mentions weather warfare and other nefarious reasons for messing with the weather/climate, but almost everything he publishes makes a point of saying that the climate is already past some tipping point where feedback loops are engaged and runaway warming is inevitable. I noticed this in his work a decade ago, and I notice the same in his modern work.
My skepticism largely arises from a distrust of the mainstream CO2 centric climate change doomerism, and also from my own observations of the skies overhead. I've been skywatching and following skywatchers online for over a decade, and the most common thing I've noticed in planes leaving lingering, spreading trails at 30-40k feet that form high cirrus hazes, often covering the sky from horizon to horizon with a high wispy haze. Everything I have read asserts that high cirrus hazes trap heat and have a net warming impact on temperatures at earth's surface. As such, I doubt the notion that one of the main goals of current geoengineering operations is to cool the planet because most of the signs I've seen in the sky point to intentional warming.
That's where I'm coming from and am curious what your thoughts are. Thank you.